IMF codes and how they apply

By Christopher Hansen

I just received this. I do not know if it is true or not. Use it at your own risk.

But I want to make a short comment about this gentleman not wanting to cause insult. The IRC is an impenetrable maze. As far as I am concerned anyone telling you that THIS IS THE WAY is wrong because no one can understand the code. It is meant to be not understandable. It is made to be unclear and anything but unequivocal. It is Satan’s bible and he is the father of lies. It is a religion and is the established civic religion of the U.S. government.

In other words: Greg Damm is a priest of this religion of Satan.

If there is one thing I am 100% certain of: I do not understand the IRC and am in complete agreement with Senator Elihu Root.

In 1913 during the debate on the first income tax act under the 16th
Amendment, Senator Elihu Root commented about the complexity of that first law:
“I guess you will have to go to jail. If that is the result of not understanding
the Income Tax Law I shall meet you there. We shall have a merry, merry time,
for all of our friends will be there. It will be an intellectual center, for no
one understands the Income Tax Law except persons who have not sufficient
intelligence to understand the questions that arise under it.”[8]
[8] See The United States Tax Court: An Historical Analysis, page 12, by Harold
Dubroff. Published by CCH.

Here are words that I do not understand:
1. Dollar (no current definition so I cannot understand it and neither can you)
2. Income
3. Taxpayer
4. Person made liable
5. United States
6. United States District Court v district court of the United States.
7. Federal Jurisdiction
8. Voluntary
9. Establishment of religion
10. Return (what are you returning?)
11. The 5th amendment
12. Perjury
13. Subornation of perjury

And that is just the tip of the iceberg. And so when you cannot even understand the words how can you know if you have a requirement to file?

Here is why the code was made so that it could not be understood:

Confucius circa 500 B. C. is reported to have said: “When words lose their meaning, people will lose their liberty.”

Senator Sam Ervin, of Watergate hearing fame said: “[J]udicial verbicide is calculated to convert the Constitution into a worthless scrap of paper and to replace our government of laws with a judicial oligarchy.”

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. said: “Life and language are alike sacred. Homicide and verbicide—that is, violent treatment of a word with fatal results to its legitimate meaning, which is its life—are alike forbidden.”

The Supreme Court was quite clear in Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 397 (1904) that when the language of the statue is not clear then the citizen is exempt:

Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid…

If there is a single person who honestly believes that the Internal Revenue Code is written in “clear and unequivocal language” then that person does “not [have] sufficient intelligence to understand the questions that arise under it.”

With that in mind… if you want to try to prove you are not a taxpayer or a person liable using Satan’s bible I believe this can be helpful.

IMF codes and how they apply

Christopher,

I am fearful of writing anything without causing an insult to someone. IRM = Internal Revenue Manual. At http://www.irs.gov/irm/index.html you will find the IRS Internal Revenue Manual. At IRM 1.11.2.6 (05-01-2008) Determining “Official Use Only” (OUO) Information, the IRS statements are at item “D”.

Title 5 USC 552a(e)(5&6) mandates all agency records to be accurate, complete, timely and relevant. At http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/document_6209-2003.pdf page 555 of the Document 6209 at 13-27 further at item 15 number 1 the manual states that the IMF (Individual Master File) ENMOD (Entity Module) shows the posting of the computer field, “VAL-1″ that identifies a continuous invalid condition.

At IRM 9.4.4.2.1.3 (12-10-2007) states, ” All tax data and related information pertaining to individual income taxpayers are posted to the IMF so that the file reflects a continuously updated and current record of each taxpayer’s account.”

As one can see the IMF (Individual Master File) is the main record of the individual income tax filer however you can also see that this IMF record remains in a continuous invalid condition therefore the IRS has no standing to bring any action either civil or criminal into a Federal Court that requires compliance with all Congressional mandate. For the IMF to be released from the invalid condition a TC 290 or TC 300 or a scrambled SSN indicator of “2″ is required. The next question is how long will the release remain before the account reverts back to its invalid condition because the process is only current for a calendar year.

“SCS- ” computer field for scrambled SSN indicator.

Title 5 mandates a perfect condition with all agency records at all times!!!

The transaction code “000″ identifies the establishment of an account that also creates the establishment of a scrambled SSN indicator. The scrambled SSN indicator identifies a condition of “(two taxpayers using the SSN)”. (See Document 6209 at page 126 and 555).

Now you have the “VAL-1″, “SCS-1″ and the transaction code “000″ all defined to indicate an invalid condition. Is this in compliance with the Congressional Mandate?

Once your attorney has an understanding of this you have the battle won but there are tons more erroneous code posting on these IMFs.