Lindsey Springer wrote:
Lindsey Springer here and hoping these words find you all well. On May 15, 2009, I moved the District Court regarding the obviously fact no District Directors or Internal Revenue Districts existed since at least 2000. On May 29, 2009, the United States Department of Justice in Washington D.C. responded to the District Court by saying:
“The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 abolished internal revenue districts as of October 1, 2000 (not the latter part of 1999 as asserted by Defendants). See Testimony of David C. Williams, Inspector General, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, dated May 8, 2001, Implementation of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Joint Hearing Before Committees of the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives.”
On June 15, 2009, I filed a reply to the United States Department of Justice response demonstrating to the Court why this undisputed fact required as a matter of law dismissal. Click here: http://www.penaltyprotestor.org/files/GJReplyMTD6.15.09.pdf
The gist of their argument is that a new 2005 regulation can apply backwards to 2000. They also argue since no districts exist regulations govern.
I pointed out that section 6091 only allows regulations when “not otherwise provided for by this title.” Click here:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sec_26_00006091—-000-.html
I pointed out that section 6091 obviously “by this title.” See 7621. Click here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sec_26_00007621—-000-.html
The United States Department of Justice in Washington D.C. responded on June 17, 2009, just two days later with a Motion to Strike my Reply claiming it did not comply with local civil rules and was 18 pages too long. Click here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sec_26_00007621—-000-.html
Yesterday, June 19, 2009, the District Court DENIED the United States Department of Justice Motion to Strike and ORDERED them to file a sur-reply by June 25, 2009. Click here: http://www.penaltyprotestor.org/files/GJOrderDenyStrikeSurreply.pdf
If you have difficulty clicking on each link then just highlight and paste in your address bar.
The Court requested the United States Department of Justice address specifically # 1,2,6 and 7 of my reply. I will post their sur-reply once I get it.
Thank you for your support.
Lindsey Springer 6.19.09