This morning I learned that Kent Dawson of Irwin Schiff infamy (Dawson told Schiff “I will not allow the law in my courtroom”) will hear arguments from the ACLU on whether or not to quash the subpoenas issued by the U.S. Department of inJustice concerning the Las Vegas Review Journal blog.
John Dawson is the brother U. S. Federal Court Judge Kent Dawson who was at the time presiding over the trials of 16 Crazy Horse Too defendants accused of robbery, extortion, and battery. Nonetheless, Judge Dawson’s brother immediately transferred the couple’s three homes, annuities, land under the Philadelphia Crazy Horse Too, and other valuables into the newly formed RILI LLC, DOMOLE LLC, NAMES NEVADA, LLC, LIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and the Lisa M. Rizzolo Separate Property Trust.
But I wanted to double check to make sure that Kent Dawson was a Mormon, like Greg Damm, so I did a bit of on line research and discovered the most interesting web site.
The picture from the website was also very interesting. I wonder if subpoenas were asked for concerning this picture.
I also found one more commentary on Brother Dawson.Click here
The Las Vegas Review Journal reported that Judge Ezra, in the Kahre case, said: “If ‘CSI: Tax’ were a television crime show, it wouldn’t pull much audience.”
It is also said, “What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas”?
Well the Kahre trial is not staying in Vegas. At my last check almost every major newspaper in America and at least one in England, is reporting the Greg Damm subpoena scandal and his attempt to violate the First Amendment.
If you want a fast search on Google use the words: Kahre Damm socialist fascist Mormon Nazi moron and watch the hits roll up.
I got 701 including The Washington Post, Salon.com, The La Times and even a paper for Taiwan. And of course many TV and Radio Stations with Web Sites also carried the AP article.
Seems like attacks on free speech are not too well respected in the USA.
But the best part of all this coverage must be the fact that from now on…every time Greg Damm or any other socialist fascist Mormon Nazi moron Googles Greg Damm’s name they will see that he is forever tied to the Greg Damm is a socialist fascist Mormon Nazi moron, comment.
How delightful.
This reporter is VERY sorry to report that he was unable to have the wit or wisdom to post those self evident words about Greg Damm.
I was talking to my good friend, Al Popp, today. He told me that the smallest tree in the world was the Princess Pine Evergreen.
And “What they heck has that got to do with the Damm’s Definition of a dollar,” you ask.
Simple. Greg Damm is a Mormon. The Book of Mormon has the most interesting measurement unit ever devised. It is one that any Fascist like Damm would love to abuse because it really is no definition at all. It was just the best measurement the guy building the boat had at that time.
And they (boats) were built after a manner that they were exceedingly tight, even that they would hold water like unto a dish; and the bottom thereof was tight like unto a dish; and the sides thereof were tight like unto a dish; and the ends thereof were peaked; and the top thereof was tight like unto a dish; and the length thereof was the length of a tree; and the door thereof, when it was shut, was tight like unto a dish.
“The boat was the length thereof was the length of a tree?” says I. Aw Ha
I have you now Mr. Greg Damm! I fully understand your understanding of the established value of the U.S. dollar.
dollar value = length of a tree!
Now we all clearly understand what a dollar is. It is just like a tree. AND EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT A TREE IS! Right?!
So the current definition of a dollar is something that could be as tall as a Princess Pine or as short as a Redwood.
Al said to me: “The current definition of a dollar is like the definition of the foot.”
Just like the word dollar the foot once had many meanings. It was, in fact, the length of YOUR foot. Then the King Of England STEPPED in (ha ha I made a funny) and said: This is ludicrous. No one has the same size foot so no one knows how long a foot is. [wise man] So the King said: I am the king so a foot will be equal to the length of MY foot. Why not?
A dollar was the same way. There were and are many “dollars.”
Currently the dollar is the name of the currency in Canada, Zimbabwe, Australia, New Zealand, and the USA and every one is different. The problem here is obvious. We need a king with a dollar so we all know what the king’s dollar is then we know that our dollar can be judged by his dollar which could have the value of a tree. Like in the wooden nickle we all know about. That comes for a tree.
But we don’t have a King. We have Congress and Congress has the power, “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;”
WOW those Founding Fathers thought of EVERYTHING. Who needs a king?
And so the original Congress followed the requirement in the Constitutuion and established the Standard of Weights and Measures and told Americans that a dollar was 371 4/16th grains of pure silver or 416 grains of standard silver. Easy. Now we know that a dollar was not a redwood nor a Princess pine but more like a miniature apple tree and that was a fixed Standard of Weights and Measure so Americans could have, in clear and unequivocal language, exactly what a dollar was.
Today, however, there is a small problem. Al explained it to me like this: “Everyone knows what a foot is because of the King of England and because Congress fixed the Standard of that Measure. But what if Congress simply removed the definition of the foot by simply removing the fixed Standard? What if the measurement of the foot became variable and fluid and was now established by irredeemable Federal Reserve notes that claim to be dollars at an exchange rate on the open market? What if the fixed Standard of Weights and Measures became the length of a tree?”
And I asked: “And what if the governemnt could devalue the standard measurement by simplify putting more foots on to the open market?”
And then the wise ole’ Al said: “And now you know what the value of a U.S. dollar is.”
And I said, “No I don’t.”
And Al said: “Right. And that is just what the government wants because if you knew what a dollar was then they would not be able to use the definition that is most beneficial to them, our money masters, at any given time.”
And I said: “But that is not fair.”
And Al said: “Right.”
So I said: “So a dollar is the length of a tree.”
And Al said: “Yes my young Padawan,” which I didn’t understand cause I am older than him.
So what I learned today is that a dollar can be anything. It can be an irredeemable note or a weight of silver or gold or copper or zinc and copper or a piece of paper to buy Mediterranean Avenue after you Pass Go and collect 200 Dollars. It is as meaningless as a foot without a fixed standard. It is the length of tree. You can fit 1000 angels on a dollar but it is small enough to fit in your pocket.
Thanks Al! Now I understand.
Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid… Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 397 (1904)
Where there is a reasonable doubt as to the meaning of a taxing act it should be construed most favorably to the taxpayer. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151
‘Tax laws, like all other laws, are made to be obeyed. They should therefore be intelligible to those who are expected to obey them.’ White v. Aronson, 302 U.S. 16 (1937)
“the terms of a penal statute… must be sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject to it what conduct on their part will render them liable to its penalties… and a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.”Connally v. General Const. Co by Justice Southerland:
“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is to-day, can guess what it will be to-morrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed? PUBLIUS. (Madison) Federalist Papers 62
Congressman Rob Gramms of Minnesota said in Congress that the code consists of over 7,000,000 words, and has been changed 5,400 times since 1986.
AND PLEASE go and vote on the pole about what should be done. The last time I looked the vote was:
47.0% (62 Votes) Fought it to the highest court in the land even if bankrupts the company and lands me in jail?
39.4% (52 Votes) Complied with information only about those who persons who clearly made threats or admitted to criminal acts?
13.6% (18 Votes) Complied with the subpoena and given up all information all about all commenters immediately?
It looks like the IRS may be backing off a bit on their First Amendment destroying subpoena thanks to the RJ and the ACLU fighting back against Greg Damm’s attack on Free Speech.
I was looking for a quote by Sun Tzu the other day about the greatest battles ever won being those that never needed to be fought because of advanced planning. I did not find it but what I did find shocked me back into the reality of the bondage we are in in America and how this bondage is ages old and well know to those that would be tyrants.
SUN TZU ON THE ART OF WAR
THE OLDEST MILITARY TREATISE IN THE WORLD
Translated from the Chinese
By LIONEL GILES, M.A. (1910)
I. LAYING PLANS
1. Sun Tzu said: The art of war is of vital importance
to the State.
2. It is a matter of life and death, a road either
to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry
which can on no account be neglected.
3. The art of war, then, is governed by five constant
factors, to be taken into account in one’s deliberations,
when seeking to determine the conditions obtaining in the field.
4. These are: (1) The Moral Law; (2) Heaven; (3) Earth;
(4) The Commander; (5) Method and discipline.
5,6. The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete
accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him
regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.
There is therefore a purely civil profession of faith of which the Sovereign should fix the articles, not exactly as religious dogmas, but as social sentiments without which a man cannot be a good citizen or a faithful subject. While it can compel no one to believe them, it can banish from the State whoever does not believe them — it can banish him, not for impiety, but as an anti-social being, incapable of truly loving the laws and justice, and of sacrificing, at need, his life to his duty. If any one, after publicly recognising these dogmas, behaves as if he does not believe them, let him be punished by death: he has committed the worst of all crimes, that of lying before the law.
The dogmas of civil religion ought to be few, simple, and exactly worded, without explanation or commentary. The existence of a mighty, intelligent and beneficent Divinity, possessed of foresight and providence, the life to come, the happiness of the just, the punishment of the wicked, the sanctity of the social contract and the laws: these are its positive dogmas. Its negative dogmas I confine to one, intolerance, which is a part of the cults we have rejected.
Now that there is and can be no longer an exclusive national religion, tolerance should be given to all religions that tolerate others, so long as their dogmas contain nothing contrary to the duties of citizenship. But whoever dares to say: Outside the Church is no salvation, ought to be driven from the State, unless the State is the Church, and the prince the pontiff.
The Civil/Civic Religion of the United States
So can the United States have an established civic religion? The Supreme Court said, “No”:
The suggestion that government may establish an official or civic religion as a means of avoiding the establishment of a religion with more specific creeds strikes us as a contradiction that cannot be accepted. Lee v. Weisman 505 U.S. 577, 590, 1992
But remember what Sun Tzu said: The art of war is of vital importance to the State and The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.
So what we have here is a quandary. If “It is of vital importance to the State for… the people to be in complete accord with their ruler” and “While [the State] can compel no one to believe [the civic religion's doctrines] it can banish from the State whoever does not believe them — it can banish him, not for impiety, but as an anti-social being, incapable of truly loving the laws and justice, and of sacrificing, at need, his life to his duty”, then how can the State survive without a civic religion?
The answer is: It cannot.
So how has the USA survived. Simple. The USA had a civil religion because the sovereign of this nation…We the People, had a civil religion. It was self imposed on each individual by the individual. Remember we were once a Nation of equals under the law because we were the sovereignty and were individual sovereigns without subjects. It was freedom because We the People were, “in complete accord with their ruler.”
Jonathan Turmbull a Crown-appointed Governor wrote back to England: “If you ask an American, who is his master? He will tell you he has none, nor any governor but Jesus Christ.”
Why? Again a simple answer. Ex. 20: 3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Read Rousseau to see what happens to people that do not place their government before God in a State with a Civil Religion.
But what happened to America’s self imposed civil religion of Christianity. President Obama, on April 6th in Ankara, Turkey told the truth when he said:
“[W]e do not consider ourselves a Christian nation…”
So if we are no longer a Christian nation then what is the Civic Religion of America that replaced self imposed Christianity, because there must be one according to Sun Tzu and Rousseau if the State is to be successful.
Obama said it. We are a “Secular Nation.” Therefore we must, out of necessity, have a religion of secularism. But there is a problem with that according to the Supreme Court.
We agree of course that the State may not establish a ‘religion of secularism’ in the sense of affirmatively opposing or showing hostility to religion, thus ‘preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe.’ School Dist. of Abington Tp., Pa. v. Schempp 374 U.S. 203, 225, 1963
In considering how we went from a free Christian Nation of individual sovereigns to a Marxism enforced slave state with the same illusion of freedom granted in the USSR Constitutions, we must remember the words of the Socialist Franklin D. Roosevelt: “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way.”
We must also remember what Roosevelt’s “New Deal” when he created the Welfare State of Socialism now called the Social Secuirty System. It is also called it a “Sacred Trust.”
Even comedians know that Social Secuirty is called a “Sacred Trust.”
So there you have it. The new civil religion where we trust the “Sacred trust” of government, and not God, to care for us.
1 Tim. 4: 10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
What has occurred in America is just history repeating itself just like when Israel rejected God for an earthly king. America has rejected King Jesus for King Socialism.
“But Marxism is not a religion,” you say. If you say that then you have been dumbed down by the 10th commandment of Marxism just like was planned for you by Marx the “other Jewish messiah”:
10. Free education for all children in public schools.
“Marx thus is best understood not fundamentally as an economist at all, but as another Jewish messiah-like Jesus-with another message of salvation for the world. If the message of Jesus had conquered the Mediterranean and European world, the Marxist gospel in the twentieth century would spread over Russia, China, and many other nations-to billions of people throughout the globe. As Paul Tillich said in his history of Christian religion, and however distorted the Marxist gospel, Marx was one of the most influential ‘theologians’ who ever lived.” Economics as Religion, by Robert Nelson, Professor in the School of Public Affairs at the University of Maryland, Penn State Press (psupress.org) 2001
Communism/Marxism is a Civil Religion and its principles are perfectly Rousseauean.
While it can compel no one to believe them, — it can banish him, not for impiety, but as an anti-social being, incapable of truly loving the laws and justice, and of sacrificing, at need, his life to his duty.
1936 Constitution of the USSR says Communist had a “sacred duty” to safeguard socialism.
ARTICLE 131. It is the duty of every citizen of the U.S.S.R. to safeguard and strengthen public, socialist property as the sacred and inviolable foundation of the Soviet system, as the source of the wealth and might of the country, as the source of the prosperous and cultured life of all the working people. Persons committing offenses against public, socialist property are enemies of the people.
The 1977 Constitution of the USSR repeats this duty to socialism says also states that Citizens are guaranteed freedom of conscience, and religion.
Article 61. Citizens of the USSR are obliged to preserve and protect socialist property.
Article 52. Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed freedom of conscience, that is, the right to profess or not to profess any religion, and to conduct religious worship or atheistic propaganda. Incitement of hostility or hatred on religious grounds is prohibited.
In the USSR, the church is separated from the state, and the school from the church.
Article 62. Citizens of the USSR are obliged to safeguard the interests of the Soviet state, and to enhance its power and prestige.
Defence of the Socialist Motherland is the sacred duty of every citizen of the USSR.
Betrayal of the Motherland is the gravest of crimes against the people.
Can’t you just hear the cheer from Rousseau? “Well done my good and faithful servants.”
“If any one, after publicly recognising these dogmas, behaves as if he does not believe them, let him be punished by death: he has committed the worst of all crimes, that of lying before the law.”
Do any of you honestly believe that there was freedom of religion in the USSR?
Marx, Lenin and Mao were not alone in implementing civil religion. Click here to read about how Hitler was also a “messiah” to his people and created his own civic region.
How can a man have the right to profess or not to profess any religion, and to conduct religious worship while at the same time have a duty “to safeguard and strengthen public, socialist property as…sacred”? And what happens to Americans that do not “safeguard and strengthen public, socialist [security system and the graduated income tax system] as sacred”?
And if we even voice our opinions against such anti-Christ enforcement of the Religion of Marxism, what happens? CLICK HERE
Do any of you honestly believe that there is freedom of religion in the USA?
Compare the duty of Communist Citizens to the duty Americans have according to the Declaration of Independence:
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Gal. 5: 1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
But I bet you still believe that there is freedom of religion is the USA.
If so then ask yourself what would happen to you in the USA if your religion’s doctrine stated that Social Secuirty was Satanic and refused to participate or carry and use their Number.
What if you were commanded by your religion to eschew socialism? How could you eschew socialism and get a job or buy a house or buy or sell in America today?
“But the Mark of the Beast is tied to the number 666,” you say.
Ask yourself what would happen to you if you refused to “voluntarily” participate in the 2nd plank/commandemnt of the Communist Manifesto.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Would you become “enemies of the people”? Would the IRS declare war on you? The IRS believes it is at war even if you don’t. Read Confessions of a Tax Collector to see just how the Priests/Flamen of the IRS think.
>
Would you be “banished” to prison because your dogmas contain beliefs that are contrary to the Marxist duties of citizenship?
Would you be accused of not being “in complete accord with [your] ruler, [and failing to] follow him regardless…” by “willfully failing” to “voluntarily” confess and/or commit perjury on a 1040 form?
Would you be accused of not paying your “fair share” of the costs of the American Civil Religion of Marxism? Would you have “committed the worst of all crimes”?
What if the United States was trying to force you to believe that unequal weights and measures were not an abomination to the Lord?
Deut. 25:15 But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have: that thy days may be lengthened in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
Prov. 20:10 Divers weights, and divers measures, both of them are alike abomination to the Lord.
Does anyone honestly believe that a Federal Reserve note “dollar” is equal to a Silver Liberty dollar or gold, U.S. legal tender coins? Or is it obvious to anyone with even a bit of Christian moral fiber to know in their hearts that we have a civil religious system of divers weights, and divers measures, and that both of them are alike abomination to the Lord.
The Fifth Plank of the Communist Manifesto states: Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. (The Federal Reserve Bank was established in 1913 and although privately-owned by the very people that funded Karl Marx and his Manifesto, it maintains a monopoly on the fiat divers weights, and divers measures, “money” in circulation.)
Ask yourself what would happen to you if refused to sign a 1040 form because you did not know what a dollar was and so you could not sign it or you would be committing perjury.
NRS 199.200 Statement of what one does not know to be true. Every unqualified statement of that which one does not know to be true is equivalent to a statement of that which he knows to be false.
Ask yourself if such enforcement would be Constitutional or even meet the statutory standard of “willfulness” in violation of such Marxist law? Could such enforcement meet the requirements placed upon the IRS and the U.S. Treasury by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act?
And what if you realized that the Income tax and its unconstitutionally enforced system of diverse weights and measures was anti-Christ after you had already signed up “voluntarily” for a Social Security Number and signed a W-4 withholding Allowance form (what are you allowing by the way?) and voluntarily signed a 1040 form under penalties of perjury; and then wanted to stop being a Marxist? What would happen to you? Does Rousseau essential have that answer when he wrote:
If any one, after publicly recognising these dogmas, behaves as if he does not believe them, let him be punished by death: he has committed the worst of all crimes, that of lying before the law.
Welcome to YOUR nightmare.
Here are some facts:
The government has assisted openly or invidious and/or covert means in the establishment of the articles of faith of the civic religion of Marxism as found in what is commonly called the Communist Manifesto. A minimum of three of these articles of faith have been placed into law in part or in full. They are the 2nd, 5th and 10th planks with include, as implemented, the graduated income tax, in 1862, the National Bank charge of “greenbacks” which were credit money in 1863, free government education in 1852 (supported without constitutional authority in the federal constitution.) All of these were implemented or begun in earnest in the United States of America within 20 years of the publication, in 1848 AD, of the Articles of Faith of the prophet of Communism Karl Marx. This establishment of the civic religion of Marxism “whatever it made be called or whatever form it may adopt” (Everson v. Board of Ed. of Ewing Tp.330 U.S. 1, 16, 1947) substantially burdens my religious exercise.
The government cannot have a compelling government interest in the establishment of any plank or article of faith of any religion or anti-religion but must now, because of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, attempt to demonstrate that it has a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive upon your religious exercise.
How can the government demonstrate that establishing the Civic Religion of Marxism, or any parts of it, is a compelling government interest? So why are you still a practicing Marxist? Why don’t you pick up the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and use it to protect yourself from the established religion of Marxism? Is it because you fear the Federal Government?
Does the government fear us? Or do we fear the government? When the people fear the government, tyranny has found victory. The federal government is our servant, not our master! –Thomas Jefferson
If you do fear the government so much that you continue to be a practicing Marxist then consider the words of Samuel Adams:
If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
And what if the black robed priests of this new American Civil Religion of Marxism, often called federal judges and mistakenly called “your honor,” determine that Marxism is not a religion?
Then they would be violating their own rulings because judges cannot determine if Marxism is or is not a religion for to do so would be an establishment of religion in and of itself. The government cannot define what a “religion” is without establishing one, in violation of the First Amendment establishment clause.
A problem common to both religion clauses of the First Amendment is the dilemma of defining religion. To define religion is in a sense to establish it–those beliefs that are included enjoy a preferred constitutional status. For those left out of the definition, the definition may prove coercive. Indeed, it is in this latter context, which roughly approximates the area covered by the free exercise clause, where the cases and discussion of the meaning of religion have primarily centered. Professor Kent Greenawalt challenges the effort, and all efforts, to define religion: “No specification of essential conditions will capture all and only the beliefs, practices, and organizations that are regarded as religious in modern culture and should be treated as such under the Constitution”. Greenawalt, Religion As a Concept in Constitutional Law, 72 Cal. L.Rev. 753 (1984)
The Framers may well have intended to limit religion to the established traditional theistic varieties. But in our highly pluralistic society, with its cults and nontheistic belief systems, any such narrow definition is unworkable.
[First Amendment Law in a Nutshell, Second Edition, pp. 432-435, Jerome A Barron, West Group, 2000; ISBN 0-314-22677-X
"[S]tudies suggest a close link between the legitimation mechanisms of the former Soviet Union and the political religion of Marxism-Leninism. Because of the religious quality of Marxism, the former Soviet state has been characterized as ‘an inverted Roman Catholic theocracy and Russian Marxist communism [as an] inverted Roman Catholicism.’ (Zeldin 1969:110)”
From Civil to Political Religion: The Intersection of Culture, Religion and Politics, p. 145, by Dr. Marcela Cristi, Phd, Sociology, Wilfird Laurier University Press, 2001
And remember that the Supreme Court was clear about what the federal government cannot do:
The ‘establishment of religion’ clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever from they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between Church and State.’Everson v. Board of Ed. of Ewing Tp.330 U.S. 1, 15-16, 1947
Does the United States have an established civic religion? Be honest. You know it does. But no problem. You can still practice your religion and long as your “dogmas contain nothing contrary to the duties of citizenship.”
So now ask yourself:
1. Do I have a Social Secuirty Number that helps me to buy and sell?
2. Am I a practicing member of the “sacred trust” of Social Security?
3. Do I file a form “voluntarily” for a graduated or progressive Marxist income tax?
4. Do I call Federal Reserve Notes “dollars” and in doing so support “divers weights, and divers measures”?
5. Do I calculate my “income” in Federal Reserve Notes on “my” “voluntarily” 1040 form and in doing so commit perjury because I am too afraid to tell the government the truth?
6. Am I a practicing Communist.
So do you have your American Civil Religion Compliance ID card ready to be shown to any U.S. Compliance Officer?
So are you a Christian or a Jew or a Muslim or a Buddhist? Or are you a practicing Marxist? And if so what does that mean?
THE REVELATION OF ST JOHN THE DIVINE, CHAPTER 13
11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those bmiracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though our sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. If we will be willing and obedient, we shall eat the good of the land. But if we now refuse and rebel, we shall be devoured with the sword: For the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it and they that forsake the LORD shall be consumed.
So are you prepared to do what it takes to eschew Marxism or will you “refuse and rebel” so that you are not banished by the Civil Religion of America?
Let us refer to: A Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North-America, Now Met in Congress at Philadelphia, Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking Up Arms. In this document Thomas Jefferson, writing for the Congress, said:
“We are reduced to the alternative of chusing an unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers, or resistance by force. – The latter is our choice. – We have counted the cost of this contest, and find nothing so dreadful as voluntary slavery. – Honour, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them, if we basely entail hereditary bondage upon them.”
Compare that with the sacred pact between the generations where Social Secuirty and Medicare that resigns succeeding generations to the wretchedness of hereditary bondage.
Now choose you this day whom ye will serve.
Josh. 24: 15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve;… but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
Fascism is when the oligarchs put together enough force to enslave society in the interests of a few. It starts with fervent nationalism. Scapegoats are picked. Genocide is planned. Properties, authority and resources are seized. Territory is expanded.
THE LEADER is charismatic and backed by huge corporations. He’s an ideologue with an uncompromising belief system. He seizes power and directs the state to implement his ideas on how the world should operate. He becomes the supreme commander of the armed forces and the high court until a new election is called, if ever.
A strong central government is created under a hard line paternalistic leader. Appointees must submit to him. Rivals are silenced or eliminated through wild unfounded accusations and smear campaigns. Members of the government vote in favor of these measures in return for protection. Otherwise they could be barred from attending sessions.
The constitution is suspended by declaring emergencies. Checks and balances are removed. No questions can be asked. Power is exercised through emergency decrees blamed on an unworkable parliament or congress. Laws and decrees are passed to protect the dictator from criticism, corruption charges, criminal activities and abuse of power. His term becomes indefinite.
Other parties are banned or dissolved. State and provincial governments are abolished.
MILITARY AND PARA MILITARY power takes over the national police and military. Old army officers and reserves are called into service. Stockwell Day suggested that all agents and government employees wear uniforms.
SCAPEGOATS are created. Some are attacked and almost beaten to death. Public anger and frustration are focused on one target who have been labeled terrorists or insurgents to cause hysteria. The military takes them out of the civil court system, i.e. Guantanamo Bay. Their communities are boycotted. Agents are sent in to vandalize their properties and make them look bad. Strict penalties are set for anyone who conducts alleged phony “economic sabotage” such as protecting the environment, resources and territories.
PROPAGANDA is brainwashing to support the views of the fascists. The occult or forced conversion to one world religion causes confusion, conformist thinking and escapism. Non-followers can’t get jobs or food or services.
Media and access to information is controlled.
Small groups are infiltrated, especially the youth. Obama has created a youth corps to keep an eye on their parents and neighbors. A snitch line has been set up like the 911, Crime Stoppers and hot lines to spy on anyone anonymously.
Party supporters are sent out to distribute information and to recruit. Frequent meetings are held to feed into the frightened state of mind in troubled times.
Public meetings are stormed. Declarations are made. Destruction of opponents is demanded. Suggestions are made to set up or support a new strict government. Organizers cause dissention inside dissident groups.
Agents set up a coup-like atmosphere like marches and demonstrations. They wear out the people and give police and military practice in controlling and scaring the public.
The state makes decisions over peoples’ lives and gathers information from the cradle to the grave. Microchips from central data banks contain information on medical records, licenses, education, social services, travel, etc.
AN ECONOMIC depression is created. If the head of Bank of Canada or Bank of America disagree with the emperor, they are replaced.
Local business interests are forced to cooperate with the fascists. Large multinational companies like Wal Mart are brought in to destroy small businesses.
Appeals are made to the working class, petit bourgeois like bank clerks, middle management and those who are ambitious. They see fascism as a way to rise up in the system and become heads in the new regime. Industrialists, monarchists and the monied class fanatically support fascism. Foreign collaborators, rich authoritarians, opportunists, media moguls and business men finance the party.
Labor unions are brought under control or wiped out.
Economic engineering includes debt flotation and military expansion. Financing is based on currency manipulation including credit debts. High unemployment is maintained. Arms production is accelerated. Built are dams, highways, railroads and civic works like prisons, labor camps and holding facilities for indefinite periods.
More cops are hired. Court workers and judicial officers are increased. Legal aid, social assistance, housing and other social services are cut. Child welfare agencies are given more power to seize children. Prison sentences are longer. Control mechanisms include more probation officers, judicial supervision, conditional sentences and supervisory court orders.
Women stay home. The state takes the kids. The Fuhrer becomes their father. The standard of living is kept down. Wages are reduced. People are told to make sacrifices for the mother land.
AGGRESSIVE LAW AND ORDER campaigns are started to keep the fascists in power. Periodic demonstrations like the Nuremberg rallies are set up so the head honcho can give long confusing public speeches.
HABEAS CORPUS is suspended. Freedom of speech and assembly are suppressed.
REVOLUTIONARY DEALS are kept secret. The people have to be kept asleep so they don’t ask questions.
PRETEXT EVENTS are staged like 911 to justify bringing in anti terrorism laws and repressive measures to take away liberty in the name of security.
FOOD RATIONING is established. Hydroponic centers chemically produce food to replace farmers.
EUGENICS - Get rid of “Useless eaters”, anyone who refuses to become part of the laboring or slave class is dispensed with. Pressure is put on people by limiting access to their needs.
WAR - Adjacent territories are taken over and become protectorates as part of empire building. Everybody becomes a citizen of the world under one global order. Cultures and languages are wiped out. Americans and their supporters declare themselves to be carrying out their manifest destiny.
Government must appear to be moderate. Everybody else is being stubborn. While they call for peace, these inhuman tyrants start small local conflicts before going into a large war. If you think this is a conspiracy theory, it’s already happening. Look for yourself!
Kahentinetha MNN Mohawk Nation News, www.mohawknationnews.com kahentinetha2@yahoo.com Note: Your financial help is needed and appreciated. Please send your donations by check or money order to “MNN Mohawk Nation News”, Box 991, Kahnawake [Quebec, Canada] J0L 1B0. Or go to PayPal on website. Nia:wen thank you very much. Go to MNN “BORDER” category for more stories; New MNN Books Available now! Purchase t-shirts, mugs and more at our CafePressStore http://www.cafepress.com/mohawknews; Subscribe to MNN for breaking news updates http://.mohawknationnews.com/news/subscription.php; Sign Women Title Holders petition! http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Iroquois
I just received this. I do not know if it is true or not. Use it at your own risk.
But I want to make a short comment about this gentleman not wanting to cause insult. The IRC is an impenetrable maze. As far as I am concerned anyone telling you that THIS IS THE WAY is wrong because no one can understand the code. It is meant to be not understandable. It is made to be unclear and anything but unequivocal. It is Satan’s bible and he is the father of lies. It is a religion and is the established civic religion of the U.S. government.
In other words: Greg Damm is a priest of this religion of Satan.
If there is one thing I am 100% certain of: I do not understand the IRC and am in complete agreement with Senator Elihu Root.
In 1913 during the debate on the first income tax act under the 16th
Amendment, Senator Elihu Root commented about the complexity of that first law:
“I guess you will have to go to jail. If that is the result of not understanding
the Income Tax Law I shall meet you there. We shall have a merry, merry time,
for all of our friends will be there. It will be an intellectual center, for no
one understands the Income Tax Law except persons who have not sufficient
intelligence to understand the questions that arise under it.”[8]
[8] See The United States Tax Court: An Historical Analysis, page 12, by Harold
Dubroff. Published by CCH.
Here are words that I do not understand:
1. Dollar (no current definition so I cannot understand it and neither can you)
2. Income
3. Taxpayer
4. Person made liable
5. United States
6. United States District Court v district court of the United States.
7. Federal Jurisdiction
8. Voluntary
9. Establishment of religion
10. Return (what are you returning?)
11. The 5th amendment
12. Perjury
13. Subornation of perjury
And that is just the tip of the iceberg. And so when you cannot even understand the words how can you know if you have a requirement to file?
Here is why the code was made so that it could not be understood:
Confucius circa 500 B. C. is reported to have said: “When words lose their meaning, people will lose their liberty.”
Senator Sam Ervin, of Watergate hearing fame said: “[J]udicial verbicide is calculated to convert the Constitution into a worthless scrap of paper and to replace our government of laws with a judicial oligarchy.”
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. said: “Life and language are alike sacred. Homicide and verbicide—that is, violent treatment of a word with fatal results to its legitimate meaning, which is its life—are alike forbidden.”
The Supreme Court was quite clear in Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 397 (1904) that when the language of the statue is not clear then the citizen is exempt:
Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid…
If there is a single person who honestly believes that the Internal Revenue Code is written in “clear and unequivocal language” then that person does “not [have] sufficient intelligence to understand the questions that arise under it.”
With that in mind… if you want to try to prove you are not a taxpayer or a person liable using Satan’s bible I believe this can be helpful.
IMF codes and how they apply
Christopher,
I am fearful of writing anything without causing an insult to someone. IRM = Internal Revenue Manual. At http://www.irs.gov/irm/index.html you will find the IRS Internal Revenue Manual. At IRM 1.11.2.6 (05-01-2008) Determining “Official Use Only” (OUO) Information, the IRS statements are at item “D”.
Title 5 USC 552a(e)(5&6) mandates all agency records to be accurate, complete, timely and relevant. At http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/document_6209-2003.pdf page 555 of the Document 6209 at 13-27 further at item 15 number 1 the manual states that the IMF (Individual Master File) ENMOD (Entity Module) shows the posting of the computer field, “VAL-1″ that identifies a continuous invalid condition.
At IRM 9.4.4.2.1.3 (12-10-2007) states, ” All tax data and related information pertaining to individual income taxpayers are posted to the IMF so that the file reflects a continuously updated and current record of each taxpayer’s account.”
As one can see the IMF (Individual Master File) is the main record of the individual income tax filer however you can also see that this IMF record remains in a continuous invalid condition therefore the IRS has no standing to bring any action either civil or criminal into a Federal Court that requires compliance with all Congressional mandate. For the IMF to be released from the invalid condition a TC 290 or TC 300 or a scrambled SSN indicator of “2″ is required. The next question is how long will the release remain before the account reverts back to its invalid condition because the process is only current for a calendar year.
“SCS- ” computer field for scrambled SSN indicator.
Title 5 mandates a perfect condition with all agency records at all times!!!
The transaction code “000″ identifies the establishment of an account that also creates the establishment of a scrambled SSN indicator. The scrambled SSN indicator identifies a condition of “(two taxpayers using the SSN)”. (See Document 6209 at page 126 and 555).
Now you have the “VAL-1″, “SCS-1″ and the transaction code “000″ all defined to indicate an invalid condition. Is this in compliance with the Congressional Mandate?
Once your attorney has an understanding of this you have the battle won but there are tons more erroneous code posting on these IMFs.
Greg Damm is on a mission. Greg Damm wants to silence his opposition and he lies about them to promote his evil agenda. This is borne out is what he said to Robert Kahre’s attorney, William A. Cohan, just last year.
I was looking over past stories about Greg Damm to give to the ACLU and I found a telling article I wrote that included statements by Greg Damm showing how he misrepresents the feelings and intent of others because, perhaps, he is paranoid.
At a meeting on On February 11, 2008, Greg Damm exposed his true feelings about this case telling this entire group: “Bill, you threatened my job and my pension.”
Mr. Cohan responded: “I have never threatened you, nor could I; I have no power to do that; I have only prosecuted claims in court on behalf of my client.”
Greg Damm’s voice rose as he said: “Bill, it’s personal. You threatened my job and my pension.”
Greg Damm is now trying to destroy the First Amendment because he appears to believe that other people are out to harm him or hurt his case against Kahre. Well in the words of Mr. Cohen “I have never threatened you, nor could I; I have no power to do that;” we have only committed free speech.
Here is the old article:
Judge Jones, who in this reporter humble opinion, was working in conjunction with Deputy Attorney General Damm and a Mormon IRS agent stepped far past the “avoid the appearance of impropriety” standard that public servants should meet. But then again this is Tax Law SO SHUT UP AND PAY is the only law these criminals follow.
To be very clear: Greg Damm is a Mormon. The lead IRS agent in this case is also a Mormon. I am LDS too, by the way, so this is not an exposé on The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints but an exposé on members of this faith that have abused their authority, violated their oath of office and committed acts, which to me, can only be considered felonious and even treasonous.
As I previously posted back in February before this site was strictly a news site:
On February 11, 2008, at approximately 3:15 P.M., Bobby Kahre’s attorney, William A. Cohan met with Assistant U. S. Attorney (“AUSA”) J. Gregory Damm, Department of Justice Tax Division Attorney (“DOJ-TDA”) Jared Dwyer, IRS Special Agents Ryan Rickey and Jared Halper; and Defense Counsel Michael Kennedy and Joel Hansen (Yes he is my brother).
At this meeting Greg Damm exposed his true feelings about this case telling this entire group: “Bill, you threatened my job and my pension.”
Mr. Cohan responded: “I have never threatened you, nor could I; I have no power to do that; I have only prosecuted claims in court on behalf of my client.”
Greg Damm’s voice rose as he said: “Bill, it’s personal. You threatened my job and my pension.”
“IT’S PERSONAL”?
Maybe this Mormon Mafioso Damm forgot that if it is personal the proper thing to do is to step down. But Damm was not worried because Mormon Mafioso Judge Jones was there to protect him (as he did IMHO). Well not any more.
The Ninth Circuit Court removed Mormon Mafioso Judge Jones from this case. The exact reasons will be reported on as soon as I can get my hands on the Ruling and write the article.
There is an interesting verse in Mormon Scripture:
Hel. 6: 38 And it came to pass on the other hand, that the Nephites did build them up (the Mafia of the day) and support them, beginning at the more wicked part of them, until they had overspread all the land of the Nephites, and had seduced the more part of the righteous until they had come down to believe in their works and partake of their spoils, and to join with them in their secret murders and combinations.
Does this ever fit these mafia IRS loving criminals. It also fits the Bush Administration and the Democrats that partake in evil spoils, and to join with evil men in their secret murders and combinations.
I look forward to reading the whole ruling. See you then!
News reporter Catherine Bleish broke a story concerning the government listing Ron Paul Supporters and other liberty activists as “terrorists”. The testimony was given to the State Intelligence Analysis Oversight to discuss the Missouri Information Analysis Center and how they obtain information and give it to Federal Brown Shirts.
Kahre’s Prosecutors Are Going Nutso
by Jacob G. Hornberger
I have a hunch that things are not going well for the prosecution in the case of U.S. vs. Robert Kahre, which I blogged about last week. The reason that I say that is that it would seem the most likely explanation for the Las Vegas U.S. Attorney’s office going what can only be described as nutso.
You’re not going to believe what those federal prosecutors have done. I’ll guarantee it: You’re just not going to believe it because it just so happens to be one of most bizarre instances of federal prosecutorial abuse you’ll ever hear about.
Here’s what’s going on.
…
So, guess what they did. Again, you’re not going to believe this. According to an article by Thomas Mitchell, the editor of the paper, the feds have served the paper with a grand-jury subpoena demanding the production of the “name, date of birth, physical address, gender, ZIP code, password prompts, security questions, telephone numbers and other identifiers … the IP address” of the people who posted those comments.
Like I say, nutso! Have these people never heard of freedom of speech and the First Amendment? Can somebody get word to them that this is not the Soviet Union or Burma?
But maybe I’m being a bit hasty here. Maybe those federal prosecutors have secret information that I’m not privy to. Maybe those critics are … terrorists! Yikes!
After all, don’t forget that one of al-Qaeda’s expressed aims is to make the U.S. government spend its way into bankruptcy. Well, maybe those critics are acting on behalf of al-Qaeda in exposing how the U.S. government is, in fact, spending our nation into bankruptcy.
