Have you read about the Las Vegas Cop that shot himself? If not, you should take the time. I am still laughing at the comments. The one by the “Clark County Coroner” is priceless but “darrin” deserves a shot a comedian of the year.
By Edward C. Noonan,
Dear Yuba County American Independent Party members:
OPEN LETTER TO REVEREND JEREMIAH WRIGHT
Dear Reverend Wright,
Well, I guess you have won me over. This week I had to “lay off” my beloved 28 year old son at my computer shop. The creditors/wolves have come snapping at the door, the lights/electricity was turned off (my wife and I ran down and got a PAYDAY LOAN to turn the shop lights back on.) The shop phone and home phone frequently get turned off (then back on as soon as we re-arrange our budget to pay those emergencies as they come up.) Our house payment is always two month behind. We are only a heartbeat away from foreclosure!
They repossessed our family car last year, so we are driving around in a 1988 Ford pick-up we got from Pat’s mom when Pat’s dad got Alzheimer’s disease. So with my back against the wall, I called up my son and told him he was laid off. It broke my heart and drove me into a deep despair.
So, Reverend Wright, you win…I say it too…GOD DAMN AMERIKA!
I am sure if the members of my church, or my neighbors, or the sneering new media, or the officials of my political party (American Independent Party) or even the officers of the Democrat or Republican Party hear I said this, I’ll be excommunicated, disfellowshipped, mocked, and/or rebuked. They will say to me…”HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY SAY GOD DAMN AMERICA?” Amerika is so grand and so blessed by the Lord.
Is it so grand? Is it so blessed? Does our Constitution or our laws or spiritual salvation matter anymore? It doesn’t appear so. Mainstream Amerika has gone against our heritage and our Constitution is dead and cannot be rescued. I have lost my faith in my country, in my leaders and in myself.
Only a handful of people know I was “one of six people” to run for Governor in 2006. The news media made sure I was ignored (as were four other 3rd Party candidates.) I am willing to wager that not more than a handful of Californians can name the candidates for all six parties in California. For that matter, very few of the receivers of this “AIP Alert” knew I ran until I told them in my 2009 “alerts.”
Why? Because the corrupt Republican and Democrat Parties (which there is not a Euro’s worth of difference between them) have a desire for NO CHANGE (from the status quo). And too, no candidates can be elected without the approval of the international banksters. The CFR, Trialeral Commission and especially the Bilderberg Foundation have a direct hand in getting their puppets elected. This is the way the secret combinations can keep control of Amerika…and of course, the news media are the lapdogs of these secret combinations. A third party candidate rarely gets elected in Amerika. The news media makes sure of that! So you are right Rev. Wright…GOD DAMN AMERIKA.
The most of the news media, and Democrat/Republicans leaders mocked and sneered at the Tea Parties that we recently organized, and carried out. Nearly 2000 cities with at least 1,000 to 3,000 protesters have attended. That is more than 2,000,000 to 10,000,000 people crowded in the streets carrying signs and crying out for relief. But our voices fell on silent ears…Taxes continue to go up, and the financial rape of our men, women, children, grandchildren, great-grand children, and great-great grandchildren continue on a daily basis…Yes, Rev. Wright…I agree! …GOD DAMN AMERIKA!
And I am mad as hell over the current situation with your best buddy BarryO. Were most mainstream voters asleep in their 9th grade Constitution Class? Birthers like me (aka Constitutionalist) know that a natural born citizen is one whose parents are both citizens (both Mom and Dad). But Anti-Birthers believe all citizens in all countries are subjects of their ONE-WORLD-GOVERNMENT (translate: New World Order.) They believe that you and I are citizens of our planet, and we have no borders and we have no national sovereignty. Of course, we have no freedom and no liberties, but that doesn’t matter. Right? They believe our Constitution is FLAWED and should be flushed down the toilet with our Bible, Ten Commandments and Articles of Faith.
Rev. Wright, your buddy BarryO’s “lap-dog media” has been mocking me and my “birthers” (aka Constitutionalists) because we contend that BarryO is NOT qualified to be President, and we claim therefore, HE IS NOT PRESIDENT until he proves his qualifications.
For instance, Mr. Soetoro (aka Obama) had a daddy that was a British Foreign National…his daddy was NEVER a citizen of the US. Whereas Mr. Soetoro may be a native citizen (if his granny was not a pathological liar) and he was not born in Kenya and if he indeed was born in Hawaii (I am not convinced he was) he then maybe, just maybe he is a be “native” citizen of Hawaii…as opposed to a “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.”
Then we have the matter of his citizenship in Indonesia. When did he rebuke his Indonesia citizenship and when did he reapply for citizenship back to America? He is supposed to have traveled as an Indonesian Citizen and attended Occidental College and Columbia College as a foreign student. Show me his 1980-1990 passports…show me an american passport. Why is he hiding his passports?
Pray tell… How can you still claim Mr. Soetoro is a natural born citizen when he carries the baggage of being a citizen of four different nations? britian, kenyan, american, and indonesia. Which country is he a Natural Born Citizen of? His daddy was British so no natural born citizenship to america came from him. His adopted daddy Mr. Soetoro was an Indonesian natural born citizen…so BarryO was last a natural born citizen of that country…not the USA. (We have school records showing him as a citizen of indonesia.)
Prove to me that BarryO had a daddy that was a citizen of our country and I will cease being a birther. Else I would suggest you all take some night class on the Constitution and American Government. Anti-Birthers (translate that to Anti-Constitutionalists) do not know our countries history, laws and Constitution! Nor do they care about our Constitution…Hence, GOD DAMN AMERIKA!
And for that matter, BarryO’s mommie and daddy were never legally married. His daddy was already married in Kenya, so unless bigamy and polygamy was legal in Hawaii in 1961, then their marriage (if there was one) was never valid. So if BarryO was born out of wedlock, then that adds to the problem of his natural born status as well. This whole matter is a MESS!
And so is the many other additional sexual perversions in Amerika. Such perversions are something that GOD CANNOT BLESS! He cannot bless 80% of the trash programming being broadcasted on Television, nor the ads that are shown. He cannot bless the sexual perverts in Congress and the whoredoms being committed under Oval Office desks. He cannot bless our gay and lesbian state assembly members nor our gay and lesbian state senators. God cannot bless the satanic support the other 49% of the people fought who to defeat Prop 8. I don’t think God supports BOTH sides!
And yes! It matters whether or not BarryO is a citizen or not. If he is still an Indonesian Citizen and he never reapplied for American Citizenship it means we have a NON-CITIZEN in the White House. That is scary! I firmly believe barryO is NOT A U.S. Citizen and he is an illegal alien. He needs to be deported and forced to re-apply for citizenship to our country. Until then, GOD DAMN AMERIKA.
So, I faithfully validate your sermon…
GOD DAMN AMERIKA!
Edward C. Noonan
“…Here’s the facts, we don’t even talk about these things. On Thursday about 11:00 in the morning the Federal Reserve noticed the tremendous drawdown of money market accounts in the United States to the tune of $550 billion dollars….were being drawn out in matter of an hour or two. The Treasury opened up it’s window to help. They pumped a hundred and five billion dollars into the system and quickly realized they could not stem the tide. We were having an electronic run on the banks.”
“They decided to close the operation, closed down the money accounts and announce a guarantee of $250,000 per account so there wouldn’t be further panic out there. That’s what actually happened.”
If they had not done that, their estimations was that by 2:00 that afternoon five and a half trillion dollars would have been drawn out of the money market system of the United States…would have collapsed the entire economy of the United States and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed.
“Now we talked at that time what would have happened if that had happened? It would have been the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it and that’s why when they made the point, “we’ve got to act and do things quickly,” we did.”
“Now Secretary Paulson said let’s buy out the sub-prime mortgages. That’s when he came to Congress but he said, “give us latitude and large authority to do many things (as we decide necessary) and give us $700 billion dollars to do that.””
“Shortly after we enacted our bill with though very broad powers. The UK came out and said “NO”, “We don’t have enough money to buy toxic assets.” “We’re instead giving our money to banks so their equity grows and their not bankrupt. And so it…er…the UK started that process and that’s true. It was much cheaper to put more money in banks as equity investments than to start buying their bad assets because it became early determined that we’d have to spend 3 or 4 trillion dollars of taxpayer’s money to buy these bad assets. And we didn’t have…er…we only had 700 billion dollars.”
“So Paulson made a complete switch, went in and started putting money into buying securities and re-investing in the banks of the United States.”
“Why? Because if you don’t have a banking system you don’t have an economy and although we did that it wasn’t enough money and as fast as we did that the economy has been falling and the reason last week we’re really not better off today than we were three months ago. Because we’ve had a decrease in the equity positions of banks. Because other assets are going sour by the moment.”
“Now we’ve gotta make some decisions. Do we pour more money in? To what extent? That money might go in? I, myself think we ought to take the time and analyze where we are, have the people understand.”
“When you listen to the lady who just got off the telephone she is near panic and she doesn’t think her government is acting properly or acting in her behalf.”
“I think it’s important that we start informing that lady as to what really were the facts, what happened and get input from her. Maybe she has a better idea. You know we’re not any geniuses in economics or finances anyway. We’re Representatives of the people. We ought to take our time but let the people know this is a very difficult struggle.”
“Somebody threw is iin the middle of the Atlantic Ocean without a life raft and we’re trying to determine which is the closest shore and if there is any chance in the world to swim that far.”
“We don’t know…”
If people believe that LA County payments to judges interferes with judgments then how can a State Judge rule in a case concerning the State?
What about cases where the defendant would have to pay moneies into the State General Fund? How can a judge being paid by the State od Nevada be impartial?
The answer is: They cannot.
Commentary Canon 3E(1)
Under this rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless whether any of the specific rules in Section 3E(1) apply.
Also Note: Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3 States:
Part VI. Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct
CANON 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently
B. Adjudicative Responsibilities.
(1) A judge shall hear and decide matters assigned to the judge except those in which disqualification is required.
(5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status, and shall not permit staff, court officials and others subject to the judge’s direction and control to do so.
The following has been approved for all government school graduates:
The great mass of people…will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one. Adolph Hitler (18891945), Mein Kampf
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists”. - J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI
Gresham’s law, observation in economics that “bad money drives out good.” If two coins have the same nominal value, but are made from metals of unequal value, the cheaper will tend to drive the other out of circulation. Sir Thomas Gresham, financial agent of Queen Elizabeth I, was not the first to recognize this monetary principle, but his elucidation of it in 1558 prompted the economist H. D. Macleod to suggest the term “Gresham’s law” in the 19th century.
New Encyclopaedia Britannica, Micropaedia (1998), V. 5, p. 489.
Did you see that if you had this NOTE in 1914 AD you could take it an be paid on demand 5 dollars? So what was a dollar in 1914 AD?
We knew what they were in 1891 AD:
Then they became redeemable in “lawful money.” What is lawful money?
And so Congress, in 1985 AD, gave us back coins that they told us had the value of ONE DOLLAR:
So if that coin is worth ONE DOLLAR and you have to exchange 17 of these NOTES to get one…
Then what is the Federal Reserve NOTE really worth?
Yet even other countries seem to know what a dollar is:
And here in America we have even been given a warning by Congress concerning the Federal Reserve and Gresham’s Law. So what are you doing about it?
.png)
.png)
As a side note:
By Mark Andrews
I received this e-mail last week. A portion excerpted goes like this:
Dear Mr. Andrews:
I think the federal Hatch Act is a great way to avoid conflicts of interest when partisan politicians receive federal money at their jobs. I was thinking we should also have a Nevada Hatch Act that would ban partisan politicians from receiving any state money at their jobs. Simply applying the Hatch Act to any federal or state money would be an easy way to accomplish this. Allowing enforcement by the Nevada Attorney General or private individuals would put some teeth into it. Currently, the Office of Special Counsel investigates and prosecutes Hatch Act violations.
My response:
I actually agree with you and like the idea. In reality, it would likely never get out of committee considering the structure of the legislature.
If Article III Section One of the Nevada Constitution was being followed the way it was intended, we wouldn’t have the problem to which you refer. Separation of powers excludes from legislative office anyone who serves in the executive branch. A perverted court decision in the 70’s waved a magic wand and said that the Constitution didn’t mean what it said.
We already have 50% or more of sitting legislators working in state or county/city government or their spouses, or they and/or their spouses are already retired from such employment and receiving PERS. In addition, you are likely aware, there are additional legislators connected to law firms and their campaign managers’ PR firms who have financial interests in protecting the government domination of the legislature.
All these people are so fundamentally conflicted; yet there they are in office voting themselves their own incomes and budgets. To make the pain worse, all the government units spend collective millions of taxpayer money on lobbyists every session to load up and protect their budgets even more.
I am for your idea, of course. It seems there is not a citizens’ legislature right now.
One other formidable obstacle is the way the ballot petition laws were amended last time. They made it very nearly impossible for a citizens’ group to get a petition on the ballot, and very expensive.
The most valuable thing to do is to present and elect some non-republicans and non-democrats to the legislature, thus blocking automatic governmentalist rule.
The IAP is the party to start something like this, and is coming very close to taking some legislative seats. Next election, with all the term-limit lame ducks, some IAP seats could appear in Carson City. We could use help from any and all who are interested in freedom and proper limits on government. Your efforts would be welcome.
Mark Andrews
This is just more proof that Jefferson was right when he wrote:
“They (the judiciary) are then in fact the corps of sappers & miners, steadily working to undermine the independant rights of the States, & to consolidate all power in the hands of that government in which they have so important a freehold estate.” The Works of Thomas Jefferson in Twelve Volumes. Federal Edition. Collected and Edited by Paul Leicester Ford. 1821. Jan. 6.
Friday, July 17, 1992 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
Judge Tanner Sends Attorney To Jail For Contempt
By Peter Lewis
In a highly unusual proceeding, a federal judge late yesterday found a California defense attorney in criminal contempt and ordered him held by federal marshals in the middle of a criminal tax trial.
William Cohan’s clients are free on bond while a jury deliberates their fate.
But Cohan himself was fined $500 and ordered held for 24 hours after U.S. District Judge Jack Tanner found him in contempt for making “outrageous” remarks to jurors in his opening statement earlier this week in Seattle.
Tanner, who has a reputation for unpredictable and capricious behavior among the federal bar in Western Washington, accused Cohan of deliberately making misleading statements to the jury and attempting to obstruct justice.
Tanner seemed particularly perturbed by Cohan’s statements to the effect that all federal judges, including Tanner, were subject to manipulation by the Internal Revenue Service and were part of a government conspiracy against taxpayers.
Tanner cautioned Cohan at the time he made the remark, but the Encinitas, Calif., attorney went on to make similar assertions shortly afterward, according to a transcript Tanner made Cohan read in open court during the contempt hearing.
Tanner gave Cohan 25 minutes’ notice of the hearing, which occurred after the case went to jurors. Tanner later rejected a plea by Seattle defense attorney Dan Smith, who arrived late to represent Cohan, to stay the punishment pending an appeal to a federal appeals court.
Tanner accused Cohan of making the outrageous statements even though, Tanner contended, Cohan knew he could produce no credible evidence to sustain the allegations.
In his defense, Cohan pleaded that while he himself didn’t believe the allegations, he believed his client, a former Seattle police officer, believed them. At the time Cohan made the statements to jurors, he planned on having his client, Keith Engstrom, testify, Cohan said.
Later, after Tanner made rulings excluding certain evidence, Cohan and Engstrom decided that it wouldn’t be in his best interest to testify.
For example, Cohan said, Tanner had ruled that Engstrom would not be able to refer to a book titled “The IRS and the Black Robe Cover Up.”
But Tanner said he believed it was Cohan’s idea, not his client’s, to make the conspiracy allegations.
“There’s no question that your conduct was completely outrageous and no question that you are guilty (of criminal contempt),” Tanner told Cohan.
He then asked Cohan if he had anything to say before sentencing on the spot.
Cohan responded he “did not intend to engage in contemptuous conduct,” and only meant “to defend my client vigorously within the bounds of the law.”
Tanner could have sentenced Cohan to up to six months in jail.
Cohan’s clients, Engstrom and his wife, Sheryl Engstrom, a nurse at Providence Medical Center, are being retried on federal charges of failing to file tax returns and filing false claims, said Janet Freeman, a federal prosecutor based in Washington, D.C., in the tax division.
The couple was convicted in 1989, but the convictions were overturned on a technicality, Freeman said. Tanner, who normally sits in Tacoma, is hearing the case in Seattle.
Tanner noted in open court that Cohan had been found in contempt once before, but Cohan responded that the finding - by a state court in Colorado about 10 years ago - was overturned on appeal.
Tanner, who moved to semi-retired status early last year, was rated “worst judge in the West” by an American Lawyer magazine survey several years ago.
A more recent lawyers’ evaluation in the Almanac of the Federal Judiciary said the reputation was “well deserved and well earned. . . Lawyers said Tanner is unpredictable, capricious and difficult to try a case before.”
After court yesterday, Smith said “on-the-spot” criminal contempt hearings, such as the one Tanner conducted yesterday, are usually reserved for ongoing disruptive behavior.
What Tanner did yesterday was unprecedented in his experience, Smith said.
Prosecutor Freeman said she, too, had never before witnessed what took place in Tanner’s court yesterday.
After spending last night in jail, Cohan was to be held in detention in the U.S. marshal’s office today until 5 p.m., when he was to be released, according to Tanner’s order.
In Nevada, during Irwin Schiff’s trial tax trial, Judge Dawson in Jury Instruction #19, Judge Dawson referred to Code Sections 1, 61, 63 and 6012 and then charged the jury that ” These sections, working together, make an individual liable for income taxes. ” Such a claim finds absolutely no support anywhere in American jurisprudence. Now the Federal Government is telling Lindsay Springer that there are apparently 9 statutes that apparently must work together to impose Americans to file individual federal income tax returns.
The problem is that in the 9th circuit there must be ONLY one statute that creates a clear and unequivocal liability as per Roat v. C.I.R., 847 F.2d 1379, 1381, (C.A.9, 1988) where the court clearly ruled:
“Nothing in the language of either statute suggests section 6211(a) should be read together with section 6020(b). Nothing in the Code’s structure suggests the statutes should be read together, either. Section 6020 resides in Chapter 61 of Title 26, governing information and returns. By contrast, section 6211 resides in Chapter 63, governing assessment. See Hartman, 65 T.C. at 545.
So the 9th Circuit says it needs to be ONE statute. District Court Judge Dawson says it takes FOUR and now THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY says it takes NINE.
And what does the Supreme Court say?
“Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid…”
Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U.S. 397, 1904.
Where there is a reasonable doubt as to the meaning of a taxing act it should be construed most favorably to the taxpayer.
White v. Aronson, 302 U.S. 16, 20, 1937
‘Tax laws, like all other laws, are made to be obeyed. They should therefore be intelligible to those who are expected to obey them.
White v. Aronson, 302 U.S. 16, 20 & 21, 1937
In view of other settled rules of statutory construction, which teach that a law is presumed, in the absence of clear expression to the contrary, to operate prospectively; that, if doubt exists as to the construction of a taxing statute, the doubt should be resolved in favor of the taxpayer.
Hassett v. Welch, 303 U.S. 303, 314, 1938
So what is it Federal government?
Is there one clear and unequivocal law or four statutes that must work together or 9 work that must work together or what? When a Nevada Federal judge obviously disagrees with a federal prosecutor how can the law be clear and unequivocal?
Here is the government trying to tell the world why Americans are required to file. Ask yourself if you believe it to be clear and unequivocal and if not then you are exempt. So if you file a return you have committed perjury.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
LINDSEY KENT SPRINGER, OSCAR AMOS STILLEY, Defendants.
Case No. 09-CR-043-SPF UNITED STATES’ BILL OF PARTICULARS
The United States of America, by and through its attorneys, Thomas Scott Woodward, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma, and Kenneth P. Snoke, Assistant United States Attorney, and Charles A. O’Reilly, Special Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Bill of Particulars pursuant to the Court’s order dated July 2, 2009.
Counts 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the Indictment each include the phrase “required by law” in reference to Defendant Springer’s failure to file a federal income tax return. The filing of income tax returns is mandated by statute. United States v. Collins, 920 F.2d 619, 630-31 (10th Cir. 1990); United States v. Dawes, 951 F.2d 1189, 1193 (10th Cir. 1991); United States v. Neff, 954 F.2d 698, 699-700 (11th Cir. 1992); United States v. Hicks, 947 F.2d 1356, 1359 (9th Cir. 1991); United States v. Kerwin, 945 F.2d 92 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Wunder, 919 F.2d 34, 38 (6th Cir.1990). The statutes that required Defendant Springer file individual federal income tax returns are as follows:
Title 26, United States Code Section 1 - Tax Imposed;
Title 26, United States Code Section 61 - Gross Income Defined;
Title 26, United States Code Section 63 - Taxable Income Defined;
Title 26, United States Code Section 6011(a) - General Requirement of Return,
Statement or List;
Title 26, United States Code Section 6012(a)(1)(A) - Persons Required to Make
Returns of Income;
Title 26, United States Code Section 6072(a) - Time for Filing Income Tax
Returns;
Title 26, United States Code Section 6091 - Place for Filing Returns or Other
Documents;
Title 26, United States Code Section 6151 - Time and Place for Paying Tax Shown
on Returns;
Title 26, United States Code Section 7203 - Willful Failure to File Return, Supply
Information or Pay Tax.
Respectfully submitted,
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
The following two links will let you listen to Lindsay Springer on Ralph Winterrowd Radio show concerning the fraud that he has been able to expose.
http://www.zshare.net/audio/589334750bfa2d7b/
http://www.zshare.net/audio/58933758543490f2/
