From: Lindsey Springer
Subject: I need your support
Lindsey Springer here and offer an update and request for further support from those of you led, and have been or are willing to pledge your life, money, and sacred honor, in defense of the rule of law in this land.
It is with a heavy heart that I write to you seeking your support in the many battles, for whatever reason, God has led me to confront. For those of you who are not aware of my quadruple time efforts I would like to disclose but just a few of them to you.
Most people who are having to defend themselves against the mountains of attorneys aligning with the Internal Revenue Service find themselves in a religious battle over whether they have done something wrong or not in the eyes of God and their Country. This is a self inflicted test because in my humble opinion no such evidence of any test imposed by God is implied or exists. I am certain God looks at both intent and likelihood of success on the options you and I face.
Ever since I chose to believe in the life and meaning of Jesus Christ I, nor my life, have been the same.
As many of you know in my recent emails I reported the United States Department of Justice and CID Agents of the IRS, in response to a question regarding what specific code section “makes Springer liable” for the tax imposed on income under sec 1 of Title 26 and instead of simply identifying the specific code section or sections, each informed the Court they had no burden to show Springer was made liable for any tax by specific words in Title 26.
This places their answer up against the phrase “required by law” which the Court on July 2, 2009 ordered they direct me to what the Grand Jury meant by the phrase “required by law.”
In January, 2004, I was notified I was being investigated for purportedly selling tax shelter programs in violation of Title 26, Section 6700. In December, 2004, I was cleared of this erroneous assertion by letter to which no person disputes.
On April 25, 2005, I filed suit against certain actions by the IRS stemming from placing a business card on my front door on March 4, 2005, while sending a Notice of Levy to an address the IRS was fully aware I had never used personally. They obviously knew of my correct address by their actions in January of 2004 and December of 2004 which utilized the last known address the IRS had on file for me.
On April 26, 2005, someone assigned Brian Shern to a criminal investigation of me. It is unclear when the investigation began but is clear he did not begin on that investigation until that day.
I filed action in 2006 stemming from 11 employees of the IRS and 2 employees of the Department of Justice taking money during a home invasion to which they have been ordered to trial in case 06-156 (Northern District Oklahoma)(including Shern). The defendants recently appealed to the 10th Circuit interlocutory, meaning before the case was final, asking for the 10th Circuit to overturn the District Courtâ€™s decision that these defendants stand trial for their theft.
At the 10th Circuit, the United States Department of Justice, for the first time, was forced by that Court to admit the defendants stole or participated in the theft and cover up of the theft of money stolen from me. The theft occurred on September 16, 2005. The defendants maintain on appeal they cannot be held liable for the theft since they stated they did not steal the money until after they purportedly seized it. Can you believe that one?
On September 15, 2005, one day before the armed invasion, I commenced 05-1075 in the Western District of Oklahoma against the IRS based upon a notice of determination issued on August 16, 2005 stemming from the outcome of a CDP notice given to me in mid March, 2005 (remember the business card on the door?). I had 30 days to file the appeal of the August 16, 2005 determination. In that case I challenged the application of penalties under the Paperwork Reduction Act as I was clearly on the defense. Earlier in another appeal the 10th Circuit stated I could not raise challenges regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act on the offense and that I must only be allowed to raise protections on the defense. The present case remains pending at the 10th Circuit in 08-9004.
While these cases were pending, the attorneys for the 11 employees being bound over for trial, sued me in the Northern District of Oklahoma asserting the United States had a lien in its favor and against me. They sought fraud determinations and to take the home I currently live in. When the Court was presented with the lien “release” that I possessed the United States Department of Justice convinced another employee of the IRS to revoke my release and issue another lien ad hoc.
I appealed the decision by the IRS administratively to revoke my release wherein the IRS in January, 2009, informed me they had no jurisdiction to consider my CDP request they offered in their August 4, 2008 new lien, because they said they had given me such notice in 1999 and that I had purportedly slept on my right to any hearing at that time. I petitioned tax court claiming no such 1999 lien notice existed, that the lien was never given to me at my “last known address,” as indicated by the address on the document they suggested supported their claim. After several pleadings filed the Chief Judge of Tax Court ordered trial on September 16, 2009 in Oklahoma City.
Meanwhile, the District Court case where the employeesâ€™ attorney for the United States Department of Justice sued me to take the home I live in was suspended pending several issues one of which is the September 16, 2009 trial on the invalidity of the IRS lien.
When all that was not working to produce the desired result the numerous licensed attorneys nation wide intended, on March 10, 2009 these same attorneys and IRS employees without citation to anything other than “required by law,” purportedly convinced a group of Oklahoma residents to indict me for conspiring to impede determination of a tax liability on money given me, evading a tax liability on the same money, and failing to report a tax liability to the IRS.
Whether your issue is liens, notice of liens, levies, CDP Hearings, liability, exempt amount, the meaning of return or form, the Paperwork Reduction Act, District Directors, Internal Revenue Districts, Assessments, RACS006, donations, gifts, or just the plain meaning of words, both Federal and State involving the same listed above, my ministry and its mission should gather your attention and full support as all of these issues have presented themselves recently to me.
I have held my post now on its 19th year and will maintain it as long as I am able. I need your support as I now have 60 days to trial in one case, less than 30 on another, with several pending or hanging issues in the balance.
I have a way to receive your contribution through paypal. The address to fill in there is email@example.com. I can also receive your support c/o Lindsey Springer, 5147 S. Harvard, # 116, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135. You can also contact me through penaltyprotestor.org or firstname.lastname@example.org.
I would hope you will give strong consideration to my request and that you might also circulate this request to those who you think would care about the issues facing me as I stand ready to discuss this at anytime. I would rather be spending my time preparing for battle but I understand that with a budget in the billions and everyone on payroll of the United States defending rights can be more than complicated.
I thank you and hope these words find you blessed beyond measure.