<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Independent American News &#187; Democratic Party Corruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentamerican.org/category/democratic-party-corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentamerican.org</link>
	<description>Independent News for Independent Americans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:53:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hypocrisy, thy name is Progressive</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/02/08/hypocrisy-thy-name-is-progressive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/02/08/hypocrisy-thy-name-is-progressive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=10897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BY GLENN GREENWALD During the Bush years, Guantanamo was the core symbol of right-wing radicalism and what was back then referred to as the “assault on American values and the shredding of our Constitution”: so much so then when Barack Obama &#8230; <a href="http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/02/08/hypocrisy-thy-name-is-progressive/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BY GLENN GREENWALD</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://ts2.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1610688305937&#038;id=b902e73a2f3b9b7477feffa1ef7a49b6" class="alignright" width="264" height="264" />During the Bush years, Guantanamo was the core symbol of right-wing radicalism and what was back then referred to as the “assault on American values and the shredding of our Constitution”: so much so then when Barack Obama ran for President, he featured these issues not as a secondary but as a central plank in his campaign. But now that there is a Democrat in office presiding over Guantanamo and these other polices — rather than a big, bad, scary Republican — all of that has changed, as a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-finds-broad-support-for-obamas-counterterrorism-policies/2012/02/07/gIQAFrSEyQ_story.html?hpid=z3" target="_blank">new <em>Washington Post/ABC News</em> poll</a> today demonstrates:</p>
<blockquote><p>The sharpest edges of President Obama’s counterterrorism policy, including the use of drone aircraft to kill suspected terrorists abroad and keeping open the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have broad public support, <strong>including from the left wing of the Democratic Party.</strong></p>
<p>A new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that Obama, who campaigned on a pledge to close the brig at Guantanamo Bay and to change national security policies he criticized as inconsistent with U.S. law and values, has little to fear politically for failing to live up to all of those promises.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1593075502640&#038;id=8500749937ccdc80139eb77e06dc9d95" class="alignleft" width="184" height="184" />The survey shows that 70 percent of respondents approve of Obama’s decision to keep open the prison at Guantanamo Bay. . . . The poll shows that<strong> 53 percent of self-identified liberal Democrats — and 67 percent of moderate or conservative Democrats — support keeping Guantanamo Bay open, even though it emerged as a symbol of the post-Sept. 11 national security policies of George W. Bush, which many liberals bitterly opposed.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/repulsive_progressive_hypocrisy/">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/02/08/hypocrisy-thy-name-is-progressive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If?&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/01/09/what-if/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/01/09/what-if/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=10552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not &#8220;What If?&#8221; It is what is. GEt a clue. Stop supporting Democrats or Republicans. YOU are the problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eD_ybaXhXno" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>It is not &#8220;What If?&#8221; It is what is. GEt a clue. Stop supporting Democrats or Republicans. </p>
<p>YOU are the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2012/01/09/what-if/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banker Making More Under Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/11/08/banker-making-more-under-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/11/08/banker-making-more-under-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=9665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Marxists are fully implementing the 5th Plank of the Communist Manifesto with a Fascist Twist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Marxists are fully implementing the 5th Plank of the Communist Manifesto with a Fascist Twist.</strong></p>
<p><iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RE6iKYMk2Lc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/11/08/banker-making-more-under-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WOW!</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/16/wow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/16/wow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=9371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans and Democrats working together to enslave Americans!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Republicans and Democrats working together to enslave Americans!</strong></p>
<p><iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cCRnkamitVk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/16/wow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Bumper Sticker</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/12/best-bumper-sticker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/12/best-bumper-sticker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=9268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this one yesterday. I am still laughing at the perfection and truthfulness of this two liner: Democrats Love Big Government Republicans Hate Liberty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this one yesterday. I am still laughing at the perfection and truthfulness of this two liner:</p>
<h2>Democrats Love Big Government<br />
Republicans Hate Liberty<br />
<h2/>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/12/best-bumper-sticker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid Uses &#8220;Nuclear Option&#8221;! Liberty Protecting Filibuster Rules May Be Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/07/harry-reid-uses-nuclear-option-filibuster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/07/harry-reid-uses-nuclear-option-filibuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 03:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=9205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reid uses the ‘nuclear option’ in the Senate, setting stage for more partisan confrontation To avoid a vote on President Obama&#8217;s jobs bill Thursday night, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked a procedural motion that could change the way the &#8230; <a href="http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/07/harry-reid-uses-nuclear-option-filibuster/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reid uses the ‘nuclear option’ in the Senate, setting stage for more partisan confrontation</strong></p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://ts3.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1203476312090&#038;id=c336ef7c68754c8bd321e223df07cd38" class="alignright" width="197" height="244" />To avoid a vote on President Obama&#8217;s jobs bill Thursday night, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked a procedural motion that could change the way the Senate operates for years to come. It may not sound sexy, but the gist of last night&#8217;s high-parliamentary drama was this: The majority party in the Senate now may have a new power to cut off motions to suspend the rules.</p>
<p>For several days, Senate Republican leaders have pushed for a vote on the American Jobs Act. Their thinking in forcing a vote is simple, and quite political: They know Democrats have not yet whipped together enough votes for it to pass, so the exercise is more about embarrassing the Democratic majority than anything else.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/reid-uses-nuclear-option-senate-setting-stage-more-140312605.html">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/10/07/harry-reid-uses-nuclear-option-filibuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: A disaster for civil liberties</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/29/obama-a-disaster-for-civil-liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/29/obama-a-disaster-for-civil-liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=9104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He may prove the most disastrous president in our history in terms of civil liberties. By Jonathan Turley With the 2012 presidential election before us, the country is again caught up in debating national security issues, our ongoing wars and &#8230; <a href="http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/29/obama-a-disaster-for-civil-liberties/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>He may prove the most disastrous president in our history in terms of civil liberties.</strong></p>
<div>By Jonathan Turley</p>
</div>
<div id="story-body-text">With the 2012 presidential election before us, the country is again caught up in debating national security issues, our ongoing wars and the threat of terrorism. There is one related subject, however, that is rarely mentioned: civil liberties.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://ts2.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1146454933933&#038;id=f439f64937c5eb8598984fa373fe43b1" class="alignright" width="240" height="300" />Protecting individual rights and liberties — apart from the right to be tax-free — seems barely relevant to candidates or voters. One man is primarily responsible for the disappearance of civil liberties from the national debate, and he is <a id="PEPLT007408" title="Barack Obama" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/barack-obama-PEPLT007408.topic">Barack Obama</a>. While many are reluctant to admit it, Obama has proved a disaster not just for specific civil liberties but the civil liberties cause in the United States.</p>
<p>Civil libertarians have long had a dysfunctional relationship with the <a id="ORGOV0000005" title="Democratic Party" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/democratic-party-ORGOV0000005.topic">Democratic Party</a>, which treats them as a captive voting bloc with nowhere else to turn in elections. Not even this history, however, prepared civil libertarians for Obama. After the <a id="PEPLT000857" title="George Bush" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/presidents-of-the-united-states/george-bush-PEPLT000857.topic">George W. Bush</a> years, they were ready to fight to regain ground lost after Sept. 11. Historically, this country has tended to correct periods of heightened police powers with a pendulum swing back toward greater individual rights. Many were questioning the extreme measures taken by the Bush administration, especially after the disclosure of abuses and illegalities. Candidate Obama capitalized on this swing and portrayed himself as the champion of civil liberties.</div>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-turley-civil-liberties-20110929,0,7542436.story">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/29/obama-a-disaster-for-civil-liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Order Same as the Old Order</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/11/new-order-same-as-the-old-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/11/new-order-same-as-the-old-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=8943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What some are calling a &#8220;New Order&#8221; follows the oldest order known. It is not unlike the practice o the powerful beast devouring its helpless prey. It is an order whose motives are prompted by envy, hatred and malice. It &#8230; <a href="http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/11/new-order-same-as-the-old-order/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What some are calling a &#8220;New Order&#8221; follows the oldest order known. It is not unlike the practice o the powerful beast devouring its helpless prey. It is an order whose motives are prompted by envy, hatred and malice. It is an order that takes from man his freedom and makes it impossible for the individual, however righteous, trustworthy, talented, ambitious or competent, to work effectively, to rise and to make his contribution to the good of mankind by rendering the highest human service of which he is capable. This so-called new order is distinctly, yes, violently against the progress and welfare of the masses of the people. It would destroy the very foundations of free government. This plan displaces the rule of moral principle with that of selfishness, force and greed.</p>
<p>Richard R. Lyman<br />
 October 1941 </p>
<p>This New Order is Socialism and Social Security and Income Taxes are its children!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/09/11/new-order-same-as-the-old-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choices. Do you really have any?</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/05/17/choices-do-you-really-have-any/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/05/17/choices-do-you-really-have-any/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=8200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWiFf4UyMKVjUObQV4IRAIc1u5mbJzhQSuJDfNqqGmYKSyhCYG" class="aligncenter" width="204" height="200" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/05/17/choices-do-you-really-have-any/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Counties Have More Registered Voters Than Residents, According To Report</title>
		<link>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/04/21/illinois-counties-have-more-registered-voters-than-residents-according-to-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/04/21/illinois-counties-have-more-registered-voters-than-residents-according-to-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party Corruption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentamerican.org/?p=8021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An analysis of census figures and voter registration numbers in Illinois reveals a baffling conundrum: fourteen of the state&#8217;s 102 counties have more registered voters than voting-age residents. Rock Island County is the largest county with such a discrepancy: its &#8230; <a href="http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/04/21/illinois-counties-have-more-registered-voters-than-residents-according-to-report/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An analysis of census figures and voter registration numbers in Illinois reveals a baffling conundrum: fourteen of the state&#8217;s 102 counties have more registered voters than voting-age residents.</p>
<p>Rock Island County is the largest county with such a discrepancy: its elections website lists 125,875 registered voters, while the latest census figures list only 114,359 residents 18 years of age or older. That&#8217;s a difference of 11,516 people.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/21/illinois-counties-have-mo_n_852141.html">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentamerican.org/2011/04/21/illinois-counties-have-more-registered-voters-than-residents-according-to-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

